Unprovoked brutality of the police at anti-G20 protests in London Britain Share Tweet The media has been trying - not too convincingly - to claim that the brutal response of the police in London of the past few days was a necessary response to violent anti-G20 demonstrators. All those who participated in the events saw a different picture, a police force intent on provoking violence. This is clearly part of a plan to portray the peaceful protestors as "violent", in effect an attempt to criminalise ordinary people protesting. Here is an eyewitness account. Police attacking protesters at anti-G20 protest in London, April 1. Photo by Alex Canazei on flickr. At the G20 Meltdown in the early afternoon and Climate Camp in the evening I saw some unbelievable brutality. Myself and three other comrades arrived at Liverpool Street station at 11am for the start of the "G20 Meltdown", where four different groups were due to march from separate locations and converge at the Bank of England, protesting over the issues of war, climate change, the financial crisis, jobs, and housing. When we arrived the police had already penned in the protestors outside the station and did not seem to be allowing movement, whilst there was a quiet and tense atmosphere. Soon after we arrived, the police began escorting the march to the Bank of England. During the brief march we managed to sell a number of journals and speak to many of the protestors. The atmosphere was very relaxed at this point, and those that we spoke to seemed to understand the obvious links between the problems of war, economic crisis, and climate change. Upon arriving at the Bank of England things were initially quite jovial, and there were cheers as the other marches arrived at the same point. Quickly, however, the mood turned sour, as it became apparent that the police had begun blocking the road access and were no longer allowing anyone in or out ‑ a process known as "kettling", due to the way in which people are restricted from moving, causing the temperature to rise. It is claimed in the media that this kettling was in reaction to violence from the protestors, but I believe it was the other way round. As George Monbiot says in his article in The Guardian, "The police have been talking up violence at the G20 protests for weeks... The way officers tooled themselves up in riot gear and waded into a peaceful crowd this afternoon makes it look almost as if they were trying to ensure that their predictions came true". An injured protesters at anti-G20 protest in London, April 1. Photo by Alex Canazei. It was obvious that there was an extremely small minority of protestors who were wanting a fight, and this indeed happened briefly as they took on police in the centre of the crowd. However, the majority of the people there were peaceful protestors who had come dressed up or with their families to peacefully express their disgust at the Government and their anger towards the bankers. The police then continued to kettle the crowd for another three hours, blocking all movement away from the area, and denying people access to water, food, and toilets. This process caused normally peaceful, pacifist people to react angrily, giving the police the justification they needed to hit back with violent and brutal attacks. Many innocent people were walking around with large cuts and bruises having been punched or hit by police, and there were at least a couple of protestors who were bleeding from the head. Meanwhile, hundreds of people who just wanted to leave were crushed up against the police lines. Again, George Monbiot says, "The wildly disproportionate and unnecessary violence I've sometimes seen the police deploy could scarcely be better designed to provoke a reaction." After a few hours of being blockaded, there was a brief opening down one of the roads as police let some of the protestors escape. This opportunity was brief though, with only a few hundred leaving before the police blocked the exit again. Having managed to leave the Bank of England protests, we then proceeded to Trafalgar Square, where the Stop the War march had converged. The atmosphere here was completely peaceful, with almost no police and everyone just standing and listening to the speakers. Many journals were sold and contacts were made. Police penning in protester at anti-G20 protest in London, April 1. Photo by Cian O'Donavan on flickr. I then moved on by myself at about 6pm to visit Climate Camp, whereby hundred of protestors had set up tents along Bishopsgate Road by the European Climate Exchange. The mood upon arriving was incredibly vibrant, with music and dancing alongside talks and poetry. The whole scene was completely peaceful, and there was no sign of anyone looking to cause any trouble. However, just after 7pm, with no provocation at all, riot police waded in and began blocking the entrances to the camp at either end of the road. Not only did they block any access to the camp, but they then began to push protestors back, hitting completely passive people as they innocently put their hands up in the air chanting "This is not a riot". Tents and bikes were thrown aside by police as they used extremely brutal force to push the crowd back and claim another entrance to the road. I saw this all at close distance, but it was also all captured on video camera and can be seen here: During this whole process, many protestors were injured and were then not allowed out to receive treatment. Meanwhile one young man collapsed and had an epileptic fit, but was not given any help by the police. Once the police had claimed all the entrances to the camp they then kettled the crowd for a further four hours, whilst performing a similarly brutal attack on a crowd of peaceful protestors who had set up on the other side of the road from the camp. Small skirmishes occurred as peaceful people were again angered by their imprisonment with no justification or notification of when it would end. Finally at around 11.30pm we were allowed out, accompanied by police with barking dogs along the road. In the camp people could not understand the reason for this, and were questioning why the police would attack innocent, peaceful people. There is a misconception that the role of police in society is to protect the majority of people against a violent minority, but as Marxists we recognise that actually the opposite is true. The police (like the army, the judicial system, and the prisons) are only there to protect the interests of the ruling class, which is an oppressive and exploitative minority, against the rest of society. In this case, the police were not out to ensure the safety of the majority, but to protect the bankers and their offices. As Lenin says, in the last analysis the state is reduced to special bodies of armed men. More photographs Courtesy of Alan Canazei No Frames Open the Gallery See also: G20 fiddles while poor starve by Eric Hollies (April 2, 2009) G20: capitalism has failed by Socialist Appeal (April 1, 2009) G20: Capitalism means war by Patrick Orr (April 1, 2009) Marching against the G20 summit in London by Dan Read (April 1, 2009) Britain: Through what stage are we passing? by Rob Sewell (March 17, 2009)
